Trade union bill could challenge disputes among workers

Trade union bill could challenge disputes among workers

Trade union laws that government proposed can cause a disagreement among employees and they would be forced to use some extreme tactics.

Francis Maude and Vince Cable appointed Bruce Carr in 2013 so he could review British strike legislation. He stated that that trade union bill is seen as some type of exercise which was used to settle old scores. The union may be provoked to use different tactics, for example, to demonstrate outside of director’s house.

_75667083_cablemaudeHe was set up to guide the review regarding strike legislation because David Cameron has concerned the Unite union is using leverage tactics and they will search the houses of executives of Ineos, chemical company.

In his blog, Carr has stated that draft legislation doesn’t have any positive side that Trade Union Congress can see. That’s why these confrontations will be hard to solve.

Based on this bill any action will have to be concluded within four months. Two weeks are designed for giving a notice and this action will leave only three and half months in which the union will have the time to act.

Carr thinks that union will resort to more ultimate forms of action in order to avoid costs and legal lawsuits and employers may be subjected to use tactics of delay.

DSUFrom both sides, employer and unions, industrial discord may not be purposive, in fact it may take even worse path because they all want to set everything in the right place within the arranged time.

Carr stated that the fight between junior doctors and health secretary Jeremy Hunt would have serious turn, if they were introduced with a bill and applied within four months.

Few moths after ministers announced new strike laws, Carr’s review has been frozen.

If a new bill passes, he will make changes regarding Trade Union and Labor Relations. By this bill, strike will be approved only when 50% of voters are for that action. For any important public service majority will have to approve in 40%.

Some of the experts from oversees have doubts regarding this matter and  thinks that this matter is yet to be under discussion to visit read more .

Read More

Employee or independent contractor – what are you?

Employee or independent contractor – what are you?

Manufacturer of mayo, Hampton Creek, has become one in the line of the companies who were sued based on misclassification of workers.

Company that is based in San Francisco has been accused of violating the FLSA or Fair Labor Standards Act and NYLL or New York Labor Law because it classified its workers as independent contractors, people who were in charged for in store activities.

To understand better this mater: if you are hired as an employee you have a right for all hours to be paid, additional hours too, such as over time, employer has to provide you food and rest breaks. But, if you are hired as an independent contractor, you will have fewer rights.

EmployeePeerReviewThis is not a new issue regarding employer – worker litigation. The public has become aware of this issue when high profile cases such as Uber and FedEx came into the public.

Regarding a case of Hampton Creek, workers were denied minimum wages.

This lawsuit will seek to recover unpaid overtime, liquidated damages, fees for the attorneys, interest and all cost that plaintiffs had. click on this  states that these cases are often common practice among employers. They classify workers as independent contractors so they wouldn’t have to five them full time employment. They why these employers are under constant surveillance of court and government agencies.

FLSA-fair-labor-standards-act-employment-law-proposed-amendmentIn workers are classified as independent contractors they cannot achieve the right provided by the FLSA.

Companies can avoid litigation in cases where they can hire independent contractors, but workers need to be properly classified. Companies need to work with law in order to avoid legal lawsuits.

In the case of Hampton Creek, the assessment of how workers choose to manage their time and what is their degree of independence, also contract terms, will have effect on their classification.

Read More

Antonin Scalia – law legacy

Antonin Scalia – law legacy

When we are reweaving Justice Antonin Scalia’s cases regarding employment law we find them more confusing and complicated than we actually thought.

For example, the Abercrombie case from the last year, Justice Scalia have written report that was beneficial for employment law plaintiff. By his opinion, this case was an easy one. In this case an applicant for a job, who based on religious belief was wearing headscarf, only have to prove that that was only reason why company wouldn’t hire her.

Another case that was ruled in employer’s benefit was Young v UPS case. Creativity in pretending to be scholar –  gives us an explanation that is questionable in principles as it is pointless in practice.

150325_JURIS_PeggyYoung.jpg.CROP.promovar-mediumlargeIn a case Gross against FBL Financial Service he took place with the majority opinion. In this case was hard to determine discrimination by only saying age must be the cause of performing some employment task and not “but for”. He stated that this case was pure textualism.

<> on October 6, 2009 in Washington, DC.

His opinions regarding homosexuality were upsetting. He stated that many U.S citizens do not want to be partners in business with persons who openly engage themselves in homosexual relationship. They don’t want them to be teachers for their children, or scoutmasters. He stated that nothing’s wrong with his opinion and with the people who support the same.

Many colleagues who respected him as an exceptional expert didn’t agree with this opinion.

He was eminent speaker for the Young Lawyers’ Section of the Connecticut Bar Association. He was well respected form the navigate to this web-site.

His legacy became enormous; he could decide the case only by looking the text of U.S. Constitution. He had an ability to find a weakness in most cases regarding employer – worker lawsuits. His every decision has been written in such a style that cannot be repeated.

Read More